Thank you for your submission. Please wait for a medical professional to determine your rights to your body.
First, both campaigns against medical care [bans on abortion and bans on
gender-affirming care] point to protection of patients from future regret as a legitimate state interest
justifying restrictions on providing medical care. Second, both rely on alleged concerns about regret to
redefine the legal meaning of "informed consent" and make it easier for potential future plaintiffs to
prevail in civil suits against providers of medical care. In doing so, both treat the emotion of regret
as a distinct injury that may give rise to a range of legal rights and liabilities. The Article reveals
how conservative politicians and lawmakers use "regret" as a disciplinary tool to promote traditional
family values, especially involving natalism and "biological" sex difference.
—Noa Ben-Asher & Margot J. Pollans, p. 1
Ben-Asher, N., & Pollans, M. J. (2024). Gender Regrets: Banning Abortion and
Gender-Affirming Care. Utah Law Review, 2024(4), 763–806.